CAT vs Bobcat Skid Steer: The Ultimate Comparison for Land Clearing (2026)
The two biggest names in skid steers, compared head-to-head. We matched five CAT D3 models against five Bobcat T-series models on the specs that matter for land clearing: horsepower, hydraulic flow, operating weight, and real-world pricing. No brand loyalty. Just data.
In This Guide
TL;DR — The Quick Verdict
Choose CAT When...
Raw power, hydraulics, and land clearing dominance
- You run a forestry mulcher 80%+ of the time
- You need the strongest hydraulic system available
- You want the best cab comfort for long days
- You value maximum resale value
- You are clearing hardwoods and heavy material daily
Choose Bobcat When...
Versatility, dealer access, and attachment variety
- You split time between mulching and other tasks
- You need the widest dealer/parts network
- You want the largest selection of OEM attachments
- You are starting out and need the best value
- You work in areas with limited heavy equipment dealers
Bottom line: For dedicated land clearing and forestry mulching, CAT is the better machine. For a versatile operation that mixes clearing with site work, grading, and material handling, Bobcat gives you more flexibility at a lower buy-in. Both brands build excellent machines. You will not regret either choice if you match the model to your workload. Ready to launch? See our forestry mulching startup guide for the complete playbook.
Caterpillar (CAT): Built for Power
The heavy equipment giant that brings bulldozer-level engineering to the skid steer market.
Brand DNA
Caterpillar has been building heavy equipment since 1925. When they entered the skid steer market, they brought the same engineering philosophy that makes their dozers, excavators, and haul trucks legendary: overbuild everything, make it last, and charge a premium for quality. The current D3 series represents CAT's third generation of CTLs, and it shows. Every component feels purpose-built for heavy-duty work cycles like land clearing and forestry mulching.
CAT's approach is simple: more hydraulic power, more operating weight, a better cab, and tighter integration between engine and hydraulic systems. The D3 series CTLs use CAT's own C3.6 turbocharged diesel engines (or the C2.8 in smaller models) paired with a hydraulic system designed specifically for high-demand auxiliary attachments like forestry mulchers. This is not a farm tractor engine bolted to a generic hydraulic pump. It is an integrated power package engineered for sustained heavy-duty cycles.
CAT Strengths
- Superior hydraulic flow and pressure for mulching
- Heavier operating weights across all size classes
- Pressurized cab design standard on D3 series
- Electronic torque management prevents stalling
- Strongest resale values in the industry
- CAT Financial offers competitive equipment loans
CAT Weaknesses
- Higher purchase price across all models
- Dealer service rates 10-20% above Bobcat
- Fewer dealer locations, especially in rural areas
- Smaller OEM attachment catalog than Bobcat
- Less availability on the used market
- Parts pricing tends to be higher
Bobcat: The Original Skid Steer
The company that invented the skid steer and still leads the market in dealer coverage and attachment variety.
Brand DNA
Bobcat literally invented the skid steer loader in 1958. That 65+ year head start shows in everything from their attachment ecosystem to their dealer network. When someone says "Bobcat," most people think "skid steer"—the brand is nearly synonymous with the machine category. Bobcat (now owned by Doosan Infracore) sells more skid steers and CTLs in North America than any other manufacturer.
Bobcat's current T-series compact track loaders are built on a platform that prioritizes versatility above all else. The Bob-Tach quick-attach system has become the de facto industry standard. With over 100 OEM attachments and thousands of third-party options, a Bobcat CTL can transform from a mulching machine to a grading tool to a trencher in minutes. The T-series uses Bobcat's own 3.4L turbocharged diesel engines (a Doosan-derived design) that deliver reliable power without the complexity of some competitors' emissions systems.
Bobcat Strengths
- Largest dealer network in North America (900+ locations)
- Widest OEM attachment lineup (100+ options)
- Lower purchase price at every size class
- Massive used equipment market for parts and machines
- Bob-Tach system is the industry standard quick-attach
- Selectable joystick patterns (ISO and H)
Bobcat Weaknesses
- Lower hydraulic flow than CAT at same size class
- Lighter operating weights reduce mulching stability
- Cab comfort and noise isolation trail CAT
- Standard cab not pressurized (optional on some models)
- Slightly lower resale value than CAT
- High-flow package is an add-on, not standard
Head-to-Head Model Comparison
We matched five CAT D3 models to their closest Bobcat T-series equivalents by size class and horsepower. All specs from 2025-2026 manufacturer published data.
| Spec | CAT 249D3 | Bobcat T590 |
|---|---|---|
| Class | Small Frame | Small Frame |
| Horsepower | 74.3 HP | 74 HP |
| Operating Weight | 8,006 lb | 7,405 lb |
| Rated Operating Capacity | 2,500 lb | 2,100 lb |
| Std Hydraulic Flow | 23 GPM | 22 GPM |
| High-Flow Option | 33 GPM | 30 GPM |
| Price Range (New) | $55,000-$65,000 | $48,000-$58,000 |
| Spec | CAT 259D3 | Bobcat T650 |
|---|---|---|
| Class | Mid Frame | Mid Frame |
| Horsepower | 74.3 HP | 74 HP |
| Operating Weight | 8,820 lb | 8,185 lb |
| Rated Operating Capacity | 2,900 lb | 2,570 lb |
| Std Hydraulic Flow | 23 GPM | 23 GPM |
| High-Flow Option | 33 GPM | 33 GPM |
| Price Range (New) | $62,000-$72,000 | $55,000-$65,000 |
| Spec | CAT 279D3 | Bobcat T770 |
|---|---|---|
| Class | Large Frame | Large Frame |
| Horsepower | 92 HP | 92 HP |
| Operating Weight | 9,414 lb | 9,170 lb |
| Rated Operating Capacity | 3,200 lb | 3,475 lb |
| Std Hydraulic Flow | 29 GPM | 27 GPM |
| High-Flow Option | 38 GPM | 38 GPM |
| Price Range (New) | $75,000-$85,000 | $65,000-$80,000 |
| Spec | CAT 289D3 | Bobcat T870 |
|---|---|---|
| Class | Large Frame High-Flow | Large Frame High-Flow |
| Horsepower | 92 HP | 100 HP |
| Operating Weight | 10,036 lb | 10,285 lb |
| Rated Operating Capacity | 3,525 lb | 3,525 lb |
| Std Hydraulic Flow | 29 GPM | 28 GPM |
| High-Flow Option | 38 GPM | 38 GPM |
| Price Range (New) | $78,000-$88,000 | $75,000-$90,000 |
| Spec | CAT 299D3 XE | Bobcat T870 |
|---|---|---|
| Class | Top Tier | Top Tier (Bobcat's Largest) |
| Horsepower | 110 HP | 100 HP |
| Operating Weight | 10,200 lb | 10,285 lb |
| Rated Operating Capacity | 3,525 lb | 3,525 lb |
| Std Hydraulic Flow | 29 GPM | 28 GPM |
| High-Flow (Standard on XE) | 40 GPM | 38 GPM |
| Price Range (New) | $85,000-$95,000 | $75,000-$90,000 |
* All specs from 2025-2026 manufacturer published data. Prices are approximate new dealer prices and vary by region, options, and negotiation. High-flow hydraulic packages are optional upgrades on most models (standard on CAT 299D3 XE).
Running a Land Clearing Operation?
Whether you run CAT, Bobcat, or both, OWNR OPS helps land clearing operators manage leads, estimates, scheduling, and crews from one platform. See how the OPS Engine can grow your business.
See How OPS Engine WorksHydraulics: CAT XHP vs Bobcat High Flow
This is the single most important comparison for land clearing operators. Your mulching head is a hydraulic motor. The hydraulic system determines how fast it spins, how much power it delivers, and how productive you are.
| Hydraulic Spec | CAT D3 Series | Bobcat T-Series |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Flow | 23-29 GPM | 22-28 GPM |
| High-Flow | 33-40 GPM | 30-38 GPM |
| Operating Pressure | 4,061 PSI | 3,500 PSI |
| Hydraulic HP (at high-flow) | ~65 HP | ~55 HP |
| System Design | Closed-center load-sensing | Closed-center load-sensing |
| Hydraulic Cooler | Oversized standard | Standard (upgrade available) |
| Winner for Mulching | CAT | — |
Why This Matters for Mulching
Hydraulic horsepower is the product of flow rate and pressure. CAT's advantage is not just higher GPM—it is higher GPM at higher pressure. The CAT XHP system on the 299D3 XE delivers approximately 65 hydraulic HP to the mulcher head versus roughly 55 HP from a Bobcat T870. That 18% difference translates directly into faster cutting speed through dense material, fewer stalls in hardwoods, and higher daily production rates.
The oversized hydraulic cooler on CAT machines is another understated advantage. Sustained mulching generates enormous heat in the hydraulic system. When hydraulic fluid overheats, the system loses efficiency, components wear faster, and you are forced to idle down or shut off to cool. CAT's larger cooler keeps fluid temperatures lower during 8-hour mulching days, which means less downtime and longer component life.
The honest take: For operators running mulchers 4+ hours per day, CAT's hydraulic advantage is noticeable and meaningful. For operators who mulch 1-2 hours and then switch to other attachments, the difference is less critical, and Bobcat's hydraulic system is perfectly adequate.
Undercarriage & Tracks
The undercarriage is the most expensive wear item on any CTL. In land clearing conditions, rocks, roots, and debris grind through tracks and rollers relentlessly.
| Feature | CAT D3 Series | Bobcat T-Series |
|---|---|---|
| Track Type | Steel-embedded rubber | Steel-embedded rubber |
| Track Life (Forestry Use) | 1,500-2,000 hours | 1,200-1,800 hours |
| Track Replacement Cost | $3,500-$5,500/set | $3,000-$5,000/set |
| Undercarriage Guards | Full belly pan standard | Partial standard, full optional |
| Debris Resistance | Excellent | Good |
| Track Width (Large Frame) | 17.7" | 17.7" |
Undercarriage Verdict
CAT has a slight edge in undercarriage durability. The full belly pan protection standard on D3 models shields the undercarriage from rocks and stumps better than Bobcat's partial standard coverage. CAT tracks also tend to last 15-20% longer in forestry conditions, though the replacement cost is slightly higher.
Over 5,000 hours of forestry work, the cost difference is relatively small. Both brands use similar steel-embedded rubber track designs. The bigger factor is terrain: if you work in rocky conditions, invest in the heavy-duty track option from either manufacturer. Both brands offer forestry-specific undercarriage packages with additional guards and reinforced components for $2,000-$4,000.
Cab Comfort & Visibility
When you are spending 8-10 hours a day being shaken by a mulcher, the cab is your office. Comfort is not a luxury—it is a productivity and safety factor.
| Feature | CAT D3 Series | Bobcat T-Series |
|---|---|---|
| Pressurized Cab | Standard | Optional upgrade |
| Interior Noise Level | 72 dBA | 76 dBA |
| Seat Type | Air-ride heated (standard) | Mechanical suspension (air-ride optional) |
| Display | 10" touchscreen | 5" display (7" on premium) |
| HVAC | Automatic climate control | Manual A/C and heat |
| Visibility (Side) | Excellent | Good |
| Rearview Camera | Standard | Optional |
| Joystick Controls | Electro-hydraulic | Selectable ISO/H pattern |
Cab Verdict
CAT wins cab comfort decisively. The pressurized cab standard on D3 models is a game-changer for land clearing work. Mulching throws an enormous amount of dust, dirt, and fine debris into the air. A pressurized cab keeps that out of the operator's lungs and off the controls. Bobcat offers pressurized cab packages as an upgrade, but it adds $2,000-$3,500 to the price.
The noise difference matters over a full day. At 72 dBA, the CAT cab is noticeably quieter than Bobcat's 76 dBA. That 4-decibel difference may sound small, but decibels are logarithmic—76 dBA is roughly 2.5 times louder than 72 dBA in perceived volume. After 8 hours of mulching, the CAT operator will be meaningfully less fatigued.
Bobcat's edge: Selectable joystick patterns. Bobcat lets operators switch between ISO and H-pattern controls, which is valuable if you have multiple operators with different training backgrounds. CAT uses electro-hydraulic controls that some operators find smoother and more precise, but the pattern is fixed.
Attachment Compatibility
For land clearing operators who run multiple attachments, compatibility and quick-change capability matter.
CAT: Universal Coupler
- Accepts all standard universal quick-attach attachments
- Compatible with Bob-Tach attachments (no adapter needed)
- CAT Work Tool line includes 40+ attachments
- Flat-face hydraulic couplers standard (less mess)
- Smaller OEM attachment catalog than Bobcat
Bobcat: Bob-Tach System
- 100+ OEM attachments—largest in the industry
- Bob-Tach is the de facto industry standard coupler
- Power Bob-Tach available for in-cab attachment changes
- Widest third-party aftermarket support
- Some Bobcat-specific attachments need adapter for other brands
Attachment Verdict
Bobcat wins on attachment variety. If your operation runs 5+ different attachments regularly (mulcher, grapple, bucket, auger, trencher, stump grinder), Bobcat's ecosystem is unmatched. For land clearing specifically, both brands accept all major third-party mulching heads from FAE, Fecon, Denis Cimaf, Loftness, and others without any adapter issues. The forestry mulcher you choose will bolt onto either brand with a standard universal coupler.
Dealer Network & Support
When your machine goes down on a job, how fast you get parts and service determines how much money you lose. Dealer proximity is not a nice-to-have—it is a business requirement.
| Factor | CAT | Bobcat |
|---|---|---|
| North American Dealers | ~600+ | ~900+ |
| Rural Coverage | Moderate | Excellent |
| Parts Availability | Excellent (larger stock per dealer) | Good (more locations) |
| Service Department Size | Larger, more specialized | Smaller but adequate |
| Service Labor Rate | $125-$175/hour | $100-$145/hour |
| Field Service | Available at most dealers | Available at most dealers |
| Manufacturer Financing | CAT Financial (competitive rates) | Doosan Financial |
Dealer Verdict
Bobcat wins on coverage breadth. CAT wins on service depth. Bobcat's 900+ dealer locations mean you are rarely more than 30-45 minutes from a dealer, even in rural areas where land clearing operators typically work. CAT dealers are larger operations with more parts in stock and deeper technical expertise, but they are concentrated near urban and industrial centers.
Before you buy either brand, search for dealers within a 1-hour drive of where you typically work. A CAT machine 90 minutes from the nearest dealer will cost you more in downtime than a Bobcat with a dealer 20 minutes away. This is a practical consideration that many buyers overlook.
Resale Value
Your CTL is a depreciating asset. How much it is worth when you sell determines your true cost of ownership.
| Hours / Age | CAT (% of New) | Bobcat (% of New) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,000 hours / 1-2 years | 70-80% | 65-75% |
| 2,000 hours / 2-3 years | 60-70% | 55-65% |
| 3,000 hours / 3-4 years | 55-65% | 50-60% |
| 5,000 hours / 5-7 years | 40-50% | 35-45% |
Resale Verdict
CAT wins on resale value. A CAT 299D3 XE purchased at $90,000 and sold at 3,000 hours retains approximately $50,000-$58,000 in value. A Bobcat T870 purchased at $82,000 retains approximately $41,000-$49,000. That means the CAT's actual depreciation cost is $32,000-$40,000 over 3,000 hours versus $33,000-$41,000 for the Bobcat.
When you factor in resale, the real-world cost difference between CAT and Bobcat narrows significantly. CAT costs more to buy but retains more value when you sell. For operators who trade machines every 3,000-4,000 hours, CAT's total cost of ownership is surprisingly competitive with Bobcat despite the higher sticker price.
For Land Clearing & Forestry Mulching Specifically
This is where it matters most for our audience. If you are buying a CTL specifically for land clearing and forestry mulching, here is the focused comparison.
The Forestry Mulching Showdown: CAT 279D3 / 299D3 vs Bobcat T770 / T870
CAT 299D3 XE for Mulching
- 110 HP delivers 10% more engine power than T870
- 40 GPM high-flow standard—no upgrade needed
- Higher hydraulic pressure means more power to mulcher
- Electronic torque management prevents stalling
- Pressurized cab keeps dust out all day
- Oversized hydraulic cooler for sustained mulching
Bobcat T870 for Mulching
- 100 HP handles commercial mulching work
- 38 GPM high-flow runs most mulcher heads well
- 10,285 lb provides solid stability
- $10,000-$15,000 less than the CAT 299D3 XE
- Easier to find parts and service in rural areas
- Switches to other attachments more easily
Land clearing verdict: If your business is 80%+ forestry mulching and you are clearing hardwoods daily, the CAT 299D3 XE is the better machine. The 10 extra HP, 2 extra GPM, and higher hydraulic pressure compound over thousands of hours into measurably higher production rates. If mulching is 50-70% of your work and you also run grapples, buckets, and other attachments regularly, the Bobcat T870 gives you 90% of the mulching performance at a meaningfully lower price with better attachment versatility.
Budget Option: CAT 279D3 vs Bobcat T770
Not everyone needs (or can afford) a top-tier machine. The CAT 279D3 and Bobcat T770 are the most popular models for land clearing startups and mid-range operations. Both deliver 92 HP with 38 GPM high-flow available, and both weigh in the 9,100-9,400 lb range.
At this price point ($65,000-$85,000), the Bobcat T770 offers better value. The CAT 279D3 has the edge in cab comfort and hydraulic pressure, but the $10,000 price difference is harder to justify when the specs are this close. Many successful land clearing operators started with a T770 and later upgraded to a CAT 299D3 once their business was generating consistent revenue.
Our recommendation for startups: Buy a used Bobcat T770 H ($40,000-$55,000), pair it with a quality mulcher head, build your revenue, then decide whether to upgrade to CAT based on your specific needs and workload. Not sure which mulcher head to pair with your carrier? Our disc vs drum comparison will help you decide.
Total Cost of Ownership
The real cost of a machine is not the sticker price. It is purchase price plus maintenance, minus resale value, over the hours you operate it. Factor these costs into your crew-day pricing to ensure every job is profitable.
| Cost Factor (Over 3,000 Hours) | CAT 299D3 XE | Bobcat T870 |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase Price | $90,000 | $82,000 |
| Annual Maintenance | $5,500/year | $4,750/year |
| Total Maintenance (3 years) | $16,500 | $14,250 |
| Track Replacement (1 set) | $4,500 | $4,000 |
| Fuel Cost (3,000 hrs @ $4/gal) | $36,000 | $33,600 |
| Total Operating Cost | $147,000 | $133,850 |
| Resale Value @ 3,000 hrs | $54,000 | $45,000 |
| True Cost of Ownership | $93,000 | $88,850 |
| Cost Per Hour | $31.00/hr | $29.62/hr |
Cost of Ownership Verdict
Bobcat costs less to own—approximately $4,150 less over 3,000 hours, or about $1.38 per operating hour. That is a real but modest difference. It works out to roughly $115 per month less for the Bobcat.
Here is the counterargument: if the CAT's higher hydraulic power lets you clear even 5% more acreage per day, the extra production revenue far exceeds the $1.38/hour cost difference. At $2,500/day billing rate, a 5% productivity gain is $125/day or $1,875/month in additional revenue. That math heavily favors the CAT for full-time mulching operations.
Bottom line: Bobcat is cheaper to own. CAT is potentially more profitable to operate at scale. For part-time or startup operations where the productivity difference is less impactful, Bobcat's lower cost is the smarter financial choice.
Ready to Build Your Land Clearing Business?
Picking the right machine is step one. Running the business profitably is step two. OWNR OPS helps land clearing operators manage leads, estimates, scheduling, and crews from one platform.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to the most common questions operators ask when choosing between CAT and Bobcat for land clearing.
Is CAT or Bobcat better for land clearing?
CAT is generally better for dedicated land clearing and forestry mulching due to superior hydraulic flow (especially the XHP system at 40 GPM), heavier operating weights for stability, and stronger high-flow performance. Bobcat is better if you split time between land clearing and other tasks, need maximum attachment variety, or want the widest dealer network. For operators running a mulcher 80%+ of the time, CAT wins. For versatile mixed-use operations, Bobcat wins.
Which holds its value better, CAT or Bobcat?
CAT holds resale value slightly better than Bobcat. After 3,000 hours, a CAT CTL typically retains 55-65% of its original value versus 50-60% for a comparable Bobcat. However, the gap has narrowed in recent years as Bobcat has improved build quality. Both brands hold value significantly better than most competitors. The key factor is maintenance records: a well-documented Bobcat will outsell a poorly maintained CAT every time.
Is CAT more expensive than Bobcat?
Yes, CAT is typically $5,000-$15,000 more expensive than a comparable Bobcat model at MSRP. For example, the CAT 279D3 starts around $75,000-$85,000 versus $65,000-$80,000 for the comparable Bobcat T770. However, CAT often includes features as standard that are optional upgrades on Bobcat (like advanced display systems), which narrows the real-world price gap. Factor in resale value and the total cost of ownership difference is smaller than the sticker price suggests.
Which has better hydraulics for forestry mulching, CAT or Bobcat?
CAT has a clear advantage in hydraulics for mulching. The CAT XHP (Extra High Pressure) system delivers up to 40 GPM at higher operating pressures than Bobcat High Flow. This means more consistent power delivery to the mulcher head, especially when cutting through dense hardwoods. Bobcat High Flow tops out at 38 GPM on most models. For operators running large 60-72 inch mulching heads in heavy material, the CAT hydraulic system provides noticeably better performance.
Does Bobcat have a better dealer network than CAT?
Yes, Bobcat has approximately 900+ dealer locations in North America versus around 600+ for CAT. More importantly, Bobcat dealers are more evenly distributed in suburban and rural areas where many land clearing operators work. CAT dealers tend to be concentrated near construction and mining hubs. However, CAT dealers typically stock more parts on-site and have larger service departments. If you are in a rural area, check dealer proximity for both brands before buying.
Can I use Bobcat attachments on a CAT skid steer?
Most universal skid steer attachments will work on both brands without modification, as both use the standard universal quick-attach coupler. However, Bobcat-specific attachments designed for the Bob-Tach system may require an adapter plate ($200-$500) to work on CAT machines. CAT uses a universal coupler that accepts most standard attachments. For mulching heads, grapples, and buckets from third-party manufacturers, there is typically no compatibility issue between the two brands.
Which is more comfortable, CAT or Bobcat cab?
CAT wins on cab comfort and refinement. The CAT D3 series cab features a pressurized design that keeps dust out during mulching, a larger standard display, better sound insulation, and a more ergonomic seat and control layout. Bobcat has improved significantly with the R-series controls, but the overall cab experience still trails CAT. For operators spending 8+ hours daily in the cab, the CAT cab reduces fatigue noticeably. The Bobcat cab is perfectly adequate but does not match CAT for all-day comfort.
What is the best CAT model for forestry mulching?
The CAT 299D3 XE is the best CAT model for forestry mulching. It delivers 110 HP, 40 GPM high-flow hydraulics standard, and 10,200 lbs of operating weight. The XE model includes the high-flow package as standard equipment, which saves $3,000-$5,000 over adding it as an option. For operators on a tighter budget, the CAT 279D3 with the high-flow option is an excellent alternative at 92 HP and 9,400 lbs.
What is the best Bobcat model for forestry mulching?
The Bobcat T870 is the best Bobcat for forestry mulching. It delivers 100 HP, 38 GPM high-flow hydraulics, and 10,285 lbs operating weight. It is Bobcat's largest CTL and provides the power and weight needed for commercial mulching. For mid-range budgets, the Bobcat T770 with the High Flow package offers excellent performance at 92 HP and 9,170 lbs for $15,000-$20,000 less.
How do CAT and Bobcat tracks compare for land clearing?
CAT and Bobcat use different track designs. CAT uses a solid-pin track chain with rubber tracks that typically lasts 1,500-2,000 hours in forestry conditions. Bobcat uses a similar rubber track design lasting 1,200-1,800 hours in heavy use. Track replacement costs are comparable at $3,000-$5,500 per set for either brand. CAT tracks tend to resist debris packing slightly better due to the undercarriage guard design. Both brands offer optional heavy-duty track packages for forestry work.
Should I buy a CAT or Bobcat for a startup land clearing business?
For a startup, Bobcat offers better value. The lower purchase price, wider dealer network, and massive used market make Bobcat the safer choice when you are building cash flow. A used Bobcat T770 with 2,000-3,000 hours ($40,000-$55,000) paired with a mulcher head gets you operational for $55,000-$75,000. Once your business is established and generating consistent revenue, upgrading to a new CAT 279D3 or 299D3 makes sense for the power and durability advantages.
How do maintenance costs compare between CAT and Bobcat?
CAT dealer service rates are typically 10-20% higher than Bobcat, but CAT machines often require fewer unscheduled repairs in the first 3,000 hours. Annual maintenance costs run $4,000-$7,000 for CAT and $3,500-$6,000 for Bobcat in land clearing conditions. Bobcat parts are generally 5-15% cheaper and more readily available. For owner-operators who do their own maintenance, the cost difference narrows significantly since both machines use standard filters, fluids, and wear parts.
Get the Tools to Run Your Operation
Whether you chose CAT, Bobcat, or are still deciding, the OPS Engine gives you everything you need to manage your land clearing business—from lead intake to invoicing. Stop juggling spreadsheets and start scaling.